QSO, Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984 MCQs - LAW Practice | PakExamPoint
Practise QSO, Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984 MCQs in LAW. Attempt multiple-choice questions, check answers and revise related subtopics.
QSO, Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984 MCQs and revision practice
Study QSO, Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984 through multiple-choice questions in LAW. This subtopic contains 276 practice questions. Read the wording carefully, compare the options and attempt an answer before checking the solution in learning mode.
Use these QSO, Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984 MCQs to identify the facts, rules or methods you need to revise. Where an explanation is available, work through it and write down why your chosen option was correct or incorrect. Revisit difficult questions after reviewing your notes, then use exam mode for timed practice.
طاہر اور ہیریس کو کھور کے قتل کے لئے مشترکہ طور پر آزمایا گیا ہے ، عدالت کے سامنے یہ ثابت ہوا ہے کہ ہیریس نے کہا تھا کہ "میں اور طاہر نے خوار کو پیسے کے لئے قتل کیا" پھر عدالت اس اعتراف کو _____ کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر غور کرسکتی ہے اور عدالت _____ کے خلاف حالات کے ثبوت کے طور پر اس طرح کے اعتراف کو مدنظر رکھ سکتی ہے؟
A. Harris - Tahir
B. None of these
C. Tahir - Harris
D. Harris - Khawar
Check answer and explanation
Answer: Harris - Tahir
Explanation Under Article 30 of QSO 1984 / Section 30 Evidence Act , a confession is primarily proof against the maker (Harris). The same confession can be used as circumstantial evidence against the co-accused (Tahir) if they are jointly tried.
Explanation It deals with classification of documents as public or private. Public records maintained in Pakistan are included under this article. Even if the original documents are private, their official record is treated differently. Such records are legally recognized as public documents. Last updated by NS on 16-April-2026
تعزیرات پاکستان کی دفعہ 367 کے تحت کسی شخص کو زبردستی تکلیف پہنچانے کے لیے اسے اغوا کرنے یا اغوا کرنے کی کیا سزا ہے؟
A. Life imprisonment
B. 10 years imprisonment and fine
C. 5 years imprisonment
D. 3 years imprisonment and fine
Check answer and explanation
Answer: 10 years imprisonment and fine
Explanation Section 367 of the Pakistan Penal Code stipulates That anyone who kidnaps or abducts a person with the intent to subject them to grievous hurt, slavery, or similar harm is punishable with imprisonment of up to 10 years and is also liable to a fine.
قانون شاہادات 1984 کے آرٹیکل 141 (3) کے مطابق ، جب کسی گواہ کو عبور کیا جاتا ہے ، تو اس سے کوئی سوال پوچھا جاتا ہے جس سے اس کے کردار کو زخمی کرکے اس کا کریڈٹ ہلا دیتا ہے ، حالانکہ اس طرح کے سوالات کا جواب براہ راست یا بالواسطہ طور پر اس کو خاکہ پیش کرسکتا ہے یا اسے براہ راست یا بالواسطہ طور پر کسی جرمانے یا سزا کا سامنا کرنا پڑتا ہے۔
A. Shall
B. None of these
C. May
D. May not
Check answer and explanation
Answer: May
Explanation During cross-examination, a witness ma y be questioned to test his credibility. Questions can be asked even if they affect the witness’s character. Such questions may aim to shake the witness’s credit or reliability. The witness can be asked even if answers may incriminate him. Last updated by NS on 16-April-2026
قانون شاہدات آرڈر 1984 کے آرٹیکل 44 کے مطابق ، ایک ساتھی سمیت تمام ملزم افراد ______ کے ذمہ دار ہوں گے؟
A. Cross Examination
B. None of these
C. Examination
D. Further Examination
Check answer and explanation
Answer: Cross Examination
Explanation As per Article 44 of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984 , rules relate to the competency of witnesses. It states that all persons, including an accused and an accomplice, are competent witnesses. However, if they testify, they are subject to the normal rules of evidence. This includes being liable to c ross-examination by the opposing party. Last updated by NS on 16-April-2026
ایک مقررہ علاقہ جس میں اتھارٹی کا استعمال کیا جاسکتا ہے؟
A. Juristic
B. Jurisprudence
C. Juristic
D. Jurisdiction
Check answer and explanation
Answer: Jurisdiction
Explanation Jurisdiction refers to the legal authority to exercise power within a fixed geographic area. It is commonly used in courts and law enforcement contexts to define the limits of authority.
C. Offence punishable with confiscation of property
D. None of these
Check answer and explanation
Answer: Offences punishable with hadd
Explanation Under the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 , an accomplice is a competent witness except in offences punishable with Hadd. This is because Hadd punishments require strict, unimpeachable evidence, and the testimony of an accomplice alone is not admissible.
Found a mistake? Use “Report correction” in the practice tool or contact us with the question and a supporting source.