QSO, Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984 MCQs - LAW Practice | PakExamPoint
Practise QSO, Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984 MCQs in LAW. Attempt multiple-choice questions, check answers and revise related subtopics.
QSO, Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984 MCQs and revision practice
Study QSO, Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984 through multiple-choice questions in LAW. This subtopic contains 276 practice questions. Read the wording carefully, compare the options and attempt an answer before checking the solution in learning mode.
Use these QSO, Qanun e Shahadat Order 1984 MCQs to identify the facts, rules or methods you need to revise. Where an explanation is available, work through it and write down why your chosen option was correct or incorrect. Revisit difficult questions after reviewing your notes, then use exam mode for timed practice.
Explanation A warrant is issued by a court or magistrate, making it an official act of a public authority. Hence, under the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order , it is treated as a public document .
قانون شاہادات کے آرٹیکل 18 کے مطابق ، _____ کسی بھی مقدمے یا وجود کی کارروائی یا غیر وجود میں پیش کیا جاسکتا ہے یا اس طرح کے دیگر حقائق جیسے کہ متعلقہ ہونے کے بعد یہاں موجود ہیں ، اور کوئی اور نہیں۔
A. None of these
B. Evidence
C. Rebuttal
D. Contradiction
Check answer and explanation
Answer: Evidence
Explanation Article 18 of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order 1984 provides that evidence may be presented regarding the existence or non-existence of facts in issue. It also covers other facts declared relevant by law to support the case in any suit or proceeding.
قانون شاہادات 1984 کے آرٹیکل 2 (2) کے مطابق ، ایک حقیقت یہ کہا جاتا ہے کہ جب ایک دوسرے کے ساتھ _____ سے متعلق آرڈر کی دفعات میں حوالہ دیا گیا کسی بھی طرح سے دوسرے کے ساتھ جڑا ہوا ہے؟
A. Significant facts
B. None of these
C. Applicable facts
D. Relevancy fact
Check answer and explanation
Answer: Relevancy fact
Explanation Article 2(2) defines relevancy as a connection between facts under the provisions relating to relevancy in the Order. Only those facts connected in the manner laid down in the relevancy provisions are admissible as relevant facts.
قانون شاہادات آرڈر 1984 کے آرٹیکل 35 کے مطابق ، کسی دستاویز کے مندرجات کے بارے میں زبانی داخلہ _____ نہیں ہے جب تک کہ پارٹی ان کو یہ ثابت کرنے کی تجویز نہ کرے کہ وہ اس طرح کے دستاویز کے مندرجات کا ثانوی ثبوت دینے کا حقدار ہے۔
A. Relevant
B. Not relevant
C. Void
D. None of these
Check answer and explanation
Answer: Not relevant
Explanation Article 35 makes oral admissions about document contents inadmissible because the document itself is the best evidence. They become relevant only if the party is entitled to give secondary evidence under the law.
قانون شاہدات آرڈر 1984 کے آرٹیکل 68 کے مطابق ، _____ کارروائیوں میں یہ حقیقت ہے کہ ملزم شخص کا خراب کردار ہے غیر متعلقہ ہے ، جب تک کہ اس کا کوئی اچھا کردار نہ ہونے کا ثبوت نہیں دیا جاتا ہے ، اس معاملے میں یہ متعلقہ ہوجاتا ہے۔
A. Legal
B. None of these
C. Civil
D. Criminal
Check answer and explanation
Answer: Criminal
Explanation Article 68 states that in criminal proceedings, an accused’s bad character is generally irrelevant . It only becomes relevant if the defence introduces evidence of the accused’s good character.
مندرجہ ذیل میں سے کون سا بنیادی ثبوت ہے اور ثانوی ثبوت نہیں؟
A. Certified copies
B. The document itself produced for the inspection of the Court
C. Copies made from or compared with the original
D. Oral accounts of the contents of a document given by some person who has himself see it
Check answer and explanation
Answer: The document itself produced for the inspection of the Court
Explanation Primary evidence is the original document itself presented before the Court. Secondary evidence includes certified copies, reproductions, or oral accounts of the document’s contents.
Explanation Courts do not require evidence on facts already admitted , as they are considered proved. Evidence is only needed for disputed facts in issue.
C. The examination of a witness by the opposite party
D. The examination of a witness by the party who called
Check answer and explanation
Answer: The examination of a witness by the party who called
Explanation Examination-in-chief is conducted by the party who has produced the witness in court. Its purpose is to present and establish facts supporting that party’s case.